From cdd346c4effaa50bd926c7e8510ae969fefa5d67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: thinkpadder1 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 16:32:02 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Removed `Adopting Flow & TypeScript` It is a very biased article. See arguments here: https://www.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/6g0k7z/adopting_flow_typescript/ --- README.md | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index f470ef4..45f964b 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -579,7 +579,6 @@ A Subset for __Architecture and Infrastructure__ * Intro * [Why use static types in JavaScript?](https://medium.freecodecamp.com/why-use-static-types-in-javascript-part-1-8382da1e0adb) * [You Might Not Need TypeScript (or Static Types)](https://medium.com/javascript-scene/you-might-not-need-typescript-or-static-types-aa7cb670a77b) - * [Adopting Flow & TypeScript](http://thejameskyle.com/adopting-flow-and-typescript.html) * [Flow](https://flow.org/en/docs/) * [Flow Runtime](https://codemix.github.io/flow-runtime/) * [Flow Comments](https://flow.org/blog/2015/02/20/Flow-Comments/)